• Home
  • About/CV
  • Blog
  • Vaping Research Alerts
  • Blog archive list
  • My books
  • Memoirs
  • Music, bands, films
  • Contact

Simon Chapman AO

~ Public health, memoirs, music

Simon Chapman AO

Tag Archives: trump

Demented, incontinent, fat, orange and balding: should there be limits on attacks on the vile Trump?

20 Thursday Aug 2026

Posted by Simon Chapman AO in Blog

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

disability, donald-trump, incontinence, trump, writing

With Trump’s peerless history of lies, convicted sexual assault, impeachments, war mongering, racism, mocking the disabled, galactic self-absorption and self-aggrandisement,  wrecking the American economy, shredding public health and environmental protections, separating refugee children from their families, enabling the Netanyahu genocide of Palestinians and you-name-it, he has given his billions of critics around the world an unending arsenal of material to hopefully hasten his exit from all our lives.

There’s been a growing conga line of essayists setting out the case for him being the worst ever American president and the most odious and dangerous man in the world. He deserves these and many more such epithets.

But there is also a lot of truly despicable cruel ridicule thrown at Trump.

Orange and balding

Like millions of people all around the world, Trump is considerably overweight and never appears in public without being caked in his fake tanning lotion, attracting names like the Mango Mussolini and the Tangerine Toddler. This has caused a tsunami of ridicule, that I admit to impulsively sharing during his first term. His fake tanning puts arc lights on his inexhaustible vanity, but in that he’s hardly Robinson Crusoe in a world of botox, cosmetic surgery, hair colouring and all the other ways people ameliorate their insecurities.

Trump’s unruly comb-over is often the butt of ridicule. Being entirely comfortable with my own follicular-challenged pate, I’ve little sympathy with elaborate and obvious efforts to disguise hair loss. So personally, I don’t supress laughter when I see Trump’s coiffure in a mess. He may well have done wonders for the hair loss industry, but for me it’s a case of fools and their money here. So I’ll happily laugh along.

Overweight

His weight is another matter. As I wrote about similar ridicule of the portly ex-Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison when he was seen in swim trunks on the beach “Body shaming is often a toxic combination of fat shaming and unadulterated ageism … The message being sent to Morrison is a message that is also received by everyone with an older and less than perfect body: stay out of public sight. We find you repulsive. We shouldn’t have to look at you. You should understand how bad you look and keep your awful body covered up.

These messages can have serious repercussions. A large majority of the population don’t measure up to this standard with its neo-eugenic sub-texts: the old and anyone falling outside some ideal body type cover millions of Australians. The net impact of this sort of shaming across the population for feelings of low self-worth, esteem and acceptance manifests itself every day in dieting, anxiety and depression.”

Dementia?

Trump’s endless succession of bizarre word salad speeches and remarks is increasingly drawing comments that he is showing signs of dementia. This is of course of immense relevance and public importance, raising critical questions about his fitness to govern and giving someone like this codes to the nuclear Armageddon button. But so often, new instances of his incoherence are mocked unmercifully, something not inconsequential to public attitudes toward dementia.

If Trump were to ridicule someone with dementia (and on his form it surely can only be time) we’d all double down on this latest low watermark of contemptibility. Yet it’s apparently all good fun if we openly smirk about Trump’s incoherence and gaffes. Let’s document and republish these, but let’s always be mindful of the impact of implying that those with dementia should be swept out of sight.

Incontinence

The most recent of all these taunts is the “diaper Don” guffawing at the possibility that he’s now incontinent. So funny? But what sort of person snickers at an older person buying nappies in the supermarket or makes an older friend self-conscious about their urine smell?

Much of the merciless ridicule is heavily gendered. Anyone publicly laughing at the hair loss or obesity of a female political leader would be rightly wear misogynistic blowback: here we go again, judging female leaders on their weight, looks, dress, fashion sense etc.

Every time these cruel taunts are amplified across social media, millions — particularly among the aged — must privately wince and feel that Trump provides open licence for widespread unleashing of the cruellest jibes that many probably feel others may apply to them too.

Thirty percent of Australians over 15 have some urinary incontinence with 1 in 50 have faecal incontinence. Their self-esteem can be wretched.

446,500 Australians live with dementia. One of them is a very dear friend who at just 70 loses his way in nearly every conversation. Just like Trump. Laughing at this would be unspeakably disgusting.

If anyone laughed at our aging parents or grandparents as they struggle with all the challenges of aging, we’d feel contempt. But we do it openly about Trump.

So are we sometimes being drawn in to the very same despicable ways of talking about disability that appal us with him? In 2016 Michelle Obama famously said “when they go low, we go high” during her speech at the Democratic National Convention. But among all the richly deserved criticism, insults and ridicule Trump attracts are barbs about his appearance that can never pass ethical standards of criticism.

Let’s never hold back with daily excoriations of Trump’s mendacity, character failings and the danger he poses to the world.  This piece by Nate White is one of the best I’ve read. But let’s always be mindful of the collateral damage some forms of this can do to many vulnerable people.

Are Tesla owners simply “supporting the finance arm of the Nazi party?”

26 Sunday Jan 2025

Posted by Simon Chapman AO in Blog

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

electric-vehicles, elon-musk, evs, greenhouse-gases, tesla, trump

Like a lot of Tesla owners, I’m sickened by Elon Musk’s metamorphosis into a mega-funder of extreme right wing political aspirants. Since acquiring Twitter in October 2022, his gleeful unleashing of armies of vile miscreants who had been blocked by Twitter’s previous management policies is rapidly turning it into a toxic sewer.

Like many others, my own Twitter following began haemorrhaging as people bailed in disgust at what he unleashed (including his own rancid posts) and his desecration of the platform’s functionality and culture. Today, I rarely use it, having moved to the fresh air on BlueSky.    

At first many of us resisted the name change from Twitter to X, but we must now acknowledge that Twitter is dead and what remains, X, is a very different beast. To refer to it as Twitter is to deny Musk’s destruction of what was a vibrant town square.

The oceans of money he poured into Trump’s re-election campaign turbo-charged his X disgrace. His fascist-style fist-pumps and salutes on Trump’s inauguration day removed any scintilla of doubt about Musk’s values.

If I ever buy another car, it would certainly be an EV, but not a Tesla. I fully support efforts to raise awareness of Musk’s mendacity and to urge potential EV purchasers to think hard about their choices.

But that said, there’s a good deal of simplistic Manichean thinking being flung about here. And not a little hypocrisy when, as is highly likely, many of the Tesla haters continue to do their bit to fund Big Oil when they continue to fill their fossil-fuelled cars and motorbikes.

So should those who are disgusted by Musk all feel mortified about driving our Teslas? Should we all get rid of them and spread the word? It’s now common to hear people remark that while they understand how excellent Teslas may be as an electric vehicle, they would never buy one because of all Musk stands for. The implication here is that if you have a Tesla, you are somehow declaring yourself as a Musk fan and have lined up with all other Tesla owners to enrich him. You need to feel shameful, apologise and seriously think about selling your Tesla. This video lays out that case.

Tesla also makes Powerwall batteries, with 600,000 sold worldwide by early 2024. Many competitors have now entered the rapidly expanding market.

Tesla also owns Starlink the high speed internet service which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SpaceX, a major Musk company. Among its many uses, is its ability to provide internet access in remote locations inaccessible to Australia’s National Broadband Network. The Starlink Mini is a compact, portable internet kit. An ocean sailing friend tells me there is currently no alternative for affordable internet access far away from land.

So presumably, those arguing that buying Tesla vehicles helps fund Musk’s agenda would also count purchasers of his batteries and Starlink internet as equally complicit and shameful.

Tesla was incorporated in 2003 by Martin Erberhard and Marc Tarpenning. From February 2004, the PayPal multi-millionaire Musk led fundraising and had been chairman and principal fundraiser for Tesla, then CEO from 2008. Today he’s the world’s wealthiest person.

Teslas have been on sale since 2008. We’d used one on a holiday to France in 2016 and had been immensely impressed but until the Model 3 was launched in 2017, found the price way out of our league. We bought our Model 3 in June 2021 for $AUD52,000 after a $15,000 trade-in on our sedate little Mazda. This outlay was similar to the cost of many decidedly non high-end petrol-fuelled cars.

Three motivations to buy our Tesla

We bought the car to reduce our carbon footprint, to save serious money on fuel and servicing and to enjoy a driving experience that is endlessly wonderful.

Transport vehicles are the leading source of anthropogenic carbon emissions and the only source where these emissions are rising  (see European data below). A typical fossil fuelled car emits 4.6 tonnes of CO2 a year from its exhaust. EVs of course have no exhaust and emit nothing once manufactured.

Like ICE vehicles, EV manufacturing entails emissions. The chart below shows US EPA lifetime greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) estimates for ICE and fully electric vehicles.

# “feedstock” here refers to materials like liquids, cloth, rubber etc used in manufacturing

So in summary, reducing vehicle emissions is of immense importance in reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, and EVs are hands-down winners over ICE vehicles when it comes to emission reductions.

Cost savings

The savings involved in EV ownership can be huge. Our experience of the car has been beyond outstanding. It is a fantastic thing. Our only outlay in 3.5 years has been two $60 wheel rotations. That’s all. No fuel (saving $1500 a year), no servicing and engine part repairs (saving perhaps $2500 in a typical year), 90% of our charging is done free off our solar roof during sunny days, with most of the remainder done during cheap off-peak times overnight.

A recent post on Australia’s Tesla owners Facebook page (81.6k members) from a guy who uses his as a rideshare business and has done 334,893km, explains how he’s still on the original brake pads which are more than 85% of original thickness, thanks to regenerative braking (ie: the electric motor turns into a generator and slows the car — charging the car! — when you decelerate).

This week I noticed and responded to a post on BlueSky

So let me parse the ethical issues involved. Three issues arise here for me.

First, while it is true that Musk benefits directly from every Tesla new car sale, he’s by no means the single beneficiary. The company’s market capitalisation on 26 Jan 2025 was $1.27 trillion. Musk owned 20.5% of Tesla’s stock by the end of 2024. So 79.5% of its global market capitalisation benefits other investors via dividends and stock value increases. With pension and superannuation funds being massive investors, there will be millions of ordinary working people who will be also benefitting beside Musk. Then there are the more than 100,000 Tesla employees. They probably feel good about working for a company that today makes the world’s #1 selling new car (the Model Y) and playing a role in inspiring competition from most other vehicle manufacturers which is seeing massive uptake of EVs. 18% of all cars sold in 2023 were EVs, up from 14% in 2022 and only 2% in 2018.

Ninety five percent of 2023 new EV registrations were just three markets: 60% in China (1 in 3 of all new registrations), nearly 25% in Europe (1 in 5), and 10% in the USA (1 in 10).

This is nothing but a positive development. Whatever Trump might try to do in the US, there is a massive, moving global wall of green EVs, rooftop solar, windfarms, home batteries, new green buildings and city design which is pushing forward hard. Bizarrely, Musk is in the front row in this while his buddy Trump is lining up with oil interests.

The huge curve ball being thrown here, is that Musk/Tesla is a massive contributor and stimulator to efforts by his competitors to reduce greenhouse emissions. But he is at the same time an odious stimulus to politics that may take humanity back to very dark periods.

Second, if I were to sell our Tesla and buy another EV make, I would lose an estimated $25-$30k off the purchase price. Competition since 2021 has seen the new price for the Model 3 fall to be competitive with and burgeoning cheaper alternatives in other manufacturers’ models. So pfft to “retaining value” — few cars ever do that and Teslas are no exception. But Jacoby glibly counsels me here that “progress always requires sacrifice”.

So, if I follow this, I’m supposed to take a $30k haircut in order to achieve …. what precisely?

Sydney’s roads would have one less Tesla reminding people of Elon? Oh wait, no. Whoever bought ours would fill the Tesla ownership gap we vacated.

So I’m left wondering what I asked Jacoby: what possible benefit selling our Telsa could ever be argued to bring?

Third, Jacoby did not answer about his own driving choices. If he drives a non-Tesla EV, great. But if he drives an ICE (internal combustion engine), I’m hoping that he has also counselled cyberspace to put notices under all ICE car and truck wipers to remind them of their moral turpitude in generating CO2.

I put this to one of Jacoby’s other respondents who wrote:

The oil industry spent $US445m in the last election cycle to help re-elect Trump and from day 1, Trump has begun thanking them with his “drill, drill, drill” war cry on the environment.

By the very same argument being used by those rallying against Musk and Telsa, anyone still driving an ICE vehicle is polluting the earth’s atmosphere while lining the pockets of Big Oil which, like Musk, is facilitating the Trumpian politics that will put major lead in the saddlebags of the global race to reduce greenhouse emissions.

To my mind, that’s the first question that anyone trying to shame Tesla drivers needs to answer.      


Selling our Tesla wouldn’t result in any fewer Teslas on the road, whereas buying a new one would. So for as long as Elon is at the helm, I won’t be buying a new Tesla. In the meantime, I’ll keep driving my zero-emissions vehicle… and I’ve ordered a sticker from Etsy that says “I bought my Tesla before we knew Elon was a Nazi.”


Blog Stats

  • 180,006 hits

Top Posts & Pages

  • Why I’m not quitting Spotify because its owner has hugely invested in weaponry
  • Vaping theology: 6 There’s nicotine in potatoes and tomatoes, so should we restrict or ban them too?
  • Vaping Research Alerts
  • My books
  • Why the “lower tobacco tax” emperor has no clothes
  • Australian smoking and vaping rates fall yet again: new national data
  • About/CV
  • Australia takes off the gloves on illegal tobacco while ‘lower the tax’ fantasists plumb new absurdities
  • Blog archive list
  • If expensive cigarettes are driving the Australian black market, why do so many countries with much cheaper cigarettes have thriving black markets too?

Comment Policy: No anonymous or pseudonymous posts will be published

Recent Posts

  • Demented, incontinent, fat, orange and balding: should there be limits on attacks on the vile Trump?
  • Hairy tales from before the death of hitch hiking
  • Fact Check: How sensible are three proposed solutions to Australia’s illegal tobacco crisis?
  • Australian smoking and vaping rates fall yet again: new national data
  • Vaping theology 27: “Vapes are 100% more effective than nicotine replacement therapy”: where do such comparisons come from and how do they conceal far more than they reveal?

Recent Comments

mellow23e2e3b287's avatarmellow23e2e3b287 on Torture by omission: why pain…
howfarlongami's avatarhowfarlongami on Farcical half-pregnant Austral…
Simon Chapman AO's avatarSimon Chapman AO on Oil crisis sees emergence of n…
hdeastburn's avatarhdeastburn on Oil crisis sees emergence of n…
Terry Pechacek's avatarTerry Pechacek on Vaping theology 25: Vaping is…

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • July 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018

Categories

  • Blog

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Simon Chapman AO
    • Join 192 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Simon Chapman AO
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...